Does clang/llvm need to be rebuilt because of the gcc 5.0 upgrade?
davejohansen at gmail.com
Sat Feb 14 19:37:58 UTC 2015
n Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:38:13AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com>
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > > > I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it works just fine
> > > > Fedora 21, but in rawhide the tests are failing with
> > > > exceptions (
> > > ).
> > > > I was thinking that maybe this was because clang/llvm needs to be
> > > > because of the gcc 5.0 upgrade. Is that the issue? Or is something
> > > > going on?
> > >
> > > In F22, C++ packages don't need to be rebuilt, we default to the old
> > > for
> > > C++. In F23, indeed, everything written in C++ needs to be rebuilt,
> > > there will eventually be a mass rebuild.
> > I remember reading that, but do you have any ideas on why the tests are
> > failing with that exception on rawhide?
> The ABI of std::string and std::list has changed in F23.
> Therefore, if you depend on C++ libraries other than libstdc++, they first
> need to be rebuilt and then your package.
Sorry. That was a total brain dead moment on my part. I forgot that F22 had
branched and so rawhide is F23.
Can I just rebuild llvm/clang? Or is there some mass rebuild that's already
in the works that that will conflict with?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel