yum or dnf in the Fedora 22 Docker base image?

Václav Pavlín vpavlin at redhat.com
Wed Feb 18 09:06:45 UTC 2015

On 17.2.2015 12:33, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Not that I know of.
> On 02/16/2015 09:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>> Thanks! Are there tracking bugs in Bugzilla I can subscribe to?
I don't think there are any - feel free to file it.
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2015 12:31 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> I think the F22 and Rawhide (Is it F23 at this point), should both use dnf
>>>>> not yum.  We need to get more testing on dnf in containers.
>>>> I'm ready to start testing F22 containers either way and would prefer
>>>> dnf. What's the best process to get this rolling? Who owns the image -
>>>> release engineering or Project Atomic? The reason I ask is that
>>>> Project Atomic has their own mailing list and uses Trac, not the Red
>>>> Hat Bugzilla, for issue tracking.
>>>> Either way, my main upstream component (RStudio Server) may end up
>>>> stuck with F21 - it doesn't link with the latest Boost right now and
>>>> they only support CentOS and Debian/Ubuntu.
>>> Vaclav is handling this right now.  I don't see this as owned by
>>> ProjectAtomic.
The problem currently is I am not able to build any Fedora image due to 
some Anaconda problems. I'll get back to you as soon as I have something 

>>> --
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


Lead Infrastructure Engineer
Developer Experience
Brno, Czech Republic

More information about the devel mailing list