Does order matter for the rebuilds for the gcc 5.0 C++ ABI change?
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Wed Feb 18 15:54:13 UTC 2015
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
> rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
> before boost was?
Yes. Jakub Jelinek wrote on this list:
Also, a releng mass rebuild, which I believe is a random package order,
would very likely not help very much, due to the ABI changes one needs to
rebuild the packages in topological order, non-C++ packages or C++ packages
that nothing C++ depends on of course can be left for the mass rebuild, but
ideally the rest should be rebuilt manually before the mass rebuild.
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
More information about the devel