Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!

[Reindl Harald]

Am 22.02.2015 um 21:59 schrieb مصعب الزعبي:
> No it's a real problem .. What the information by 443 port that shared
> by NetworkManager !!! to un-local servers .

the problem is that *nobody* knows what you are talking about

> THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF BACKDOOR !!!

you first need to define the "this" before talk about definitions

and if you are at it

* don't post HTML
* don't post right aligned content in english

> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:48:57 +0100
> From: h.reindl at thelounge.net
> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!
>
> Am 22.02.2015 um 21:41 schrieb مصعب الزعبي:
>> Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer.
>>
>> And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!!
>>
>> He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates
>> enabled and controlled by NetworkManager , domains are :
>> vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org
>> proxy3.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> And both directed tohttps://apps.fedoraproject.org/#FedoraApps
>>
>>
>> I check my (||lsof -i :443 ) ||and didn't detect any connection ..
>> ---------
>>
>> Can any body explain ...
>
> "He got a two domains without any control of him" makes no sense

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150222/87fd029c/attachment.sig>