F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

Helio Chissini de Castro helio at kde.org
Tue Feb 24 16:48:37 UTC 2015


Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive
for me: Qt4

All LXQt for now is Qt5 based.

[]'s

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Sandro Mani <manisandro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and
>> with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued
>> 0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ).
>>
>> For the spin, we had a small discussion on default applications, with
>> are a mixed feeling between keep light enough or usable from the
>> start.
>>
>> Keep light enough means use non usual browsers, text editors, and this
>> would make a spin non-attractive but very low memory consumption.
>>
>> Keep usable, means even been LXQt, we could go with kwrite as text
>> editor, firefox as browser, and go on.
>>
>> We would appreciate any input from the list as well to follow proper
>> directions on this.
>>
> FWIW, I've got an SRPM for lximage-qt lying around [1].
>
> qupzilla might be worth considering as the browser (being qt based and slim
> in dependencies), the Fedora package is somewhat out of date though.
>
>
> [1] https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/lximage-qt-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


More information about the devel mailing list