F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora
akurtako at redhat.com
Fri Feb 27 11:57:41 UTC 2015
Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are meaningless.
Red Hat Eclipse team
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jiri Vanek" <jvanek at redhat.com>
> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:42:53 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora
> On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >> If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
> >> the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
> >> way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
> >> (just like they do with other JVMs).
> > That's right.
> In that case, to add another rule - " 8) all alternatives bindings must be
> removed" - must be added.
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel