F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

Aleksandar Kurtakov akurtako at redhat.com
Fri Feb 27 11:57:41 UTC 2015


Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are meaningless.

Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jiri Vanek" <jvanek at redhat.com>
> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:42:53 PM
> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java	platform in Fedora
> 
> On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
> >> If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
> >> the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
> >> way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
> >> (just like they do with other JVMs).
> >
> > That's right.
> >
> 
> In that case, to add another rule - " 8) all alternatives bindings must be
> removed" - must be added.
> 
> J.
> 
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


More information about the devel mailing list