F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

[Jiri Vanek]

On 02/27/2015 12:57 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are meaningless.

Sound good.

J.
>
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse team
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jiri Vanek" <jvanek at redhat.com>
>> To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:42:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java	platform in Fedora
>>
>> On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>>>
>>>> If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
>>>> the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
>>>> way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
>>>> (just like they do with other JVMs).
>>>
>>> That's right.
>>>
>>
>> In that case, to add another rule - " 8) all alternatives bindings must be
>> removed" - must be added.
>>
>> J.
>>
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct