Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?

Lennart Poettering mzerqung at 0pointer.de
Sat Feb 28 10:37:11 UTC 2015


On Fri, 27.02.15 21:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nkadel at gmail.com) wrote:

> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 02/25/2015 03:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ali AlipourR <alipoor90 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
> >> 
> >> The kernel itself isn't limited.  It's just set that way in
> >> /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided by systemd.  You
> >> can edit that file,
> > 
> > The file in /usr will be overwritten by the next package update.
> > 
> >> create your own in /etc/sysctl.d/,
> > 
> > Yes, local configuration belongs to /etc.
> > See also "man sysctl.d".
> 
> Except, of course, that it is apparently Leonard Pottering's
> announced desire to stop people from using /etc/

Hmm? What? I figure "Leonard Pottering" cannot be a misspelling of my
name, given that what you claim his desire to be is certainly not even
remotely mine.

Plese stop FUDding around!

Thank you,

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat


More information about the devel mailing list