F22 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

William B william at firstyear.id.au
Tue Jan 13 20:39:26 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:09 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:

> 
> Am 13.01.2015 um 20:56 schrieb William B:
> > Unbound creates more flakiness than it solves. Unbound caches "no
> > answer" as a negative cache entry. If your wireless blips for an
> > instant, that's it, result vanishes
> 
> simply not true
> 
> there is a *huge* difference between a NXDOMAIN response and not 
> reaching the NS, that said from somebody managing DNS and mail for
> some hundret domains over many years
> 
> 

That is the case, but unbound certainly likes to cache no response in it's
negative cache in my experience. It treats them as equivalent.



- -- 
Sincerely,

William Brown

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=9QZk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the devel mailing list