DNF as default package manager

[Peter Robinson]

>> >> I really wonder what is the state here. This is on my rawhide:
>> > We strongly believe all the major problems will be resolved in time. Also,
>> > as of last week we have one person dedicated to helping people with
>> > porting their application and the rest of the developers focus mainly on
>> > major usability issues.
>> >
>> > But still, I would appreciate more cooperation from the Fedora community.
>> > Most of the package maintainers don't seem to care about this transition.
>> > They didn't respond to the bugs that are filed against their components,
>> > not even to direct emails we sent them offering help with the transition.
>>
>> All features are due to be complete in a month [1] but earlier in the
>> thread it was said that some of the functionality isn't even written
>> yet.....
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule
>
> What date are you referring to? Is it "Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline
> (testable)"? If yes then I don't see any problems. DNF has been testable for
> quite some time and I invite people to test it. If you have some specific
> needs, come and talk to us, work with us on a solution but please be open
> minded at least a little. DNF is not yum and will therefore not behave the
> same in every situation.

To quote from the top of this thread:

"ABRT uses yum and plenty of yum hacks to download debug packages. It isn't
trivial to port our yum based code to dnf, but I can assure you this task is
on our TODO list and it will bee fixed ASAP."

Is that going to be done and QAed well in that time?