F22 System Wide Change: GNOME 3.16

[drago01]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>
> Am 21.01.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Yanko Kaneti:
>>
>> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 12:26 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
>>> i.gnatenko.brain at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> + gnome-calendar
>>>> btw gnome-2048 on review already
>>
>>
>>> FWIW this one is not complete; maybe it will be ready for GNOME
>>> 3.16, but I would expect it to be included in GNOME 3.18 instead.
>>
>>
>> Its not the first and won't be the last software in Fedora that is not
>> "complete". FWIW its perfectly playable. The crash on 4096 already has
>> a pending patch.
>>
>>> I see it's already been packaged for Fedora, which is not really
>>> good as it could create a poor first impression of the app for users
>>> (e.g. there is no user help, no HC icon, it crashes when you get to
>>> 2048). I'd rather hold off on this one until it's more mature
>>> upstream.
>>
>>
>> When did Fedora become the place which only welcomes mature software?
>> IMHO what you seem to aspire to is somewhat in conflict with the
>> release early, release often principle that is behind the  "First"
>> Fedora slogan
>
>
> it's nice to have recent software, but not for every price, you should also
> consider the time users spend to solve problems left and right in your
> calculations if something is worth to be included or better wait
>
> frankly if i have the decision of something brand new with troubles or
> something outdated doing it's daily job the decision is easy and ressources
> are not only upstream and on the distribution side
>
> ressources are also on the users side because they lose will and energy of
> testing and writing bugreports if they are too much to track

This is just a game ....