DNF and mock

[Richard Shaw]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 10:15, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here...
>>
>> Why move production stuff over to dnf at all? Isn't dnf's goal in life to
>> eventually become yum? If dnf is "good enough" to start using it in
>> production, should the discussion be around dnf -> yum transition?
>>
>>
> I think that was dropped a long time ago. dnf isn't going to become yum in
> some sort of rename. It will be a seperate command and while its syntax
> will be similar it is not 100% (eg you won't be able to use a yum plugin to
> work with dnf)
>

Ahh, I hadn't seen that. Well, since the name is no longer temporary I
would like to say that it's a terrible name :)

Ok sorry for the noise, please continue.

Thanks,
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150127/d86c8fe3/attachment.html>