Is it a SELinux policy problem ?

Casper fantom at fedoraproject.org
Wed Jan 28 12:11:17 UTC 2015


Daniel J Walsh a écrit :
>    On 01/27/2015 05:11 PM, Casper wrote:
> 
>  Or is it a luajit problem ?
> 
>  Dear devs hello.
>  I would like to determine if these AVC are caused by prosody, lua, or
>  a wrong SELinux policy.
> 
> 
>    This avc (execmem) looks like it is allowed in Fedora
>    selinux-policy-3.13.1-105.fc21.src.rpm
Installing...

> 
>    Does prosody have a log file error.log?
Yes, it is commented in the default conf file, but there is some log
levels that can be uncommented:

-- Logging configuration
-- For advanced logging see http://prosody.im/doc/logging
log = {
        debug = "/var/log/prosody/debug.log";
        error = "/var/log/prosody/error.log";
        info = "/var/log/prosody/info.log";
	-- info = "prosody.log"; -- Change 'info' to 'debug' for verbose logging
        -- error = "prosody.err";
        -- "*syslog"; -- Uncomment this for logging to syslog
        -- "*console"; -- Log to the console, useful for debugging with daemonize=false
}


-- 
Autorité de Certification: http://casperlefantom.net/root.pem
Empreinte: 0975 864A 2036 0F94 A139  114A D32E 8EBE 30F2 2429

Clef GPG ID: 83288189 @ hkp://keys.fedoraproject.org
Empreinte: CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912  7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150128/5ef0f77c/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list