Investigation of the F23 mass rebuild

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 17:12:13 +0100
Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> On Qui, 2015-07-02 at 11:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > > On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to
> > > > gather some statistics on the actual impact: what the most
> > > > impacted packages and apps are, what the typical overhead is
> > > > like, etc. The results are... unpleasant,
> > > 
> > > [snip]
> > > 
> > > Impressive data mining.. for those following along for educational
> > > purposes, care to share the scripts you used for this someplace?
> > 
> > I didn't really write down the shell pipelines I used as scripts up
> > front. But it was something along the lines of:
> > 
> > # grab stuff from rawhide
> > % koji -q list-tagged-pkgs f23 | awk '{ print $1 }' | \
> 
> koji: error: Unknown command: list-tagged-pkgs
> 
> Do you mean koji -q list-tagged f23 | awk '{ print $1 }' ? 
> 
> A big aside question ,  F23 mass rebuild was for all packages ? 

Yes. 

> if not what was the list for F23 mass rebuild ? 

It was all packages. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150704/4fc7fb78/attachment.sig>