Wiki inconsistency with services enabled by default

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 10:31 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> While investigating a problem with one of my packages regarding 
> systemd I noticed there there is an inconsistency with instructions 
> on how to get a service enabled by default.
> 
> The packaging scriptlet page[1] says:
> If your package includes one or more systemd units that need to be 
> enabled by default on package installation, they need to be covered 
> by the default Fedora preset policy. The default fedora preset policy 
> is shipped as part of systemd.rpm. If your unit files are missing 
> from this list, please file a bug against the systemd package. Only 
> services covered by the policy on which services that may be enabled 
> by default on package installation are eligible for this, and you 
> will need to receive special permission from FESCo to have a package 
> start a service by default if it is not covered by the existing 
> policy.
> 
> While the Packaging:DefaultServices page[2] says:
> For services which meet one of the conditions listed above, a ticket 
> should be filed against the fedora-release package. If the preset 
> should be changed for versions other than rawhide, indicate that in 
> the ticket.
> 
> So one says to file the bug against systemd, the other says to file 
> it against fedora-release.
> 
> Which one is it?
> 


The presets have been moved to fedora-release. Please file bugs there.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150715/c0823d88/attachment.sig>