F-23 Branched report: 20150720 changes

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Mon Jul 20 12:09:06 UTC 2015

On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 14:06 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > What is wrong with the reports? Why broken dependencies are not
> > checked/reported? Why there is no Rawhide report at all?
> When we have branched and have the two reports they can run
> a/ maybe not at the same time
> b/ maybe not at the same speed
> In other words, it's not because we haven't received the rawhide 
> report yet that
> it won't arrive.
> That being said, the last rawhide report I see in my mailbox is from 
> the 18th,
> so we missed one yesterday, let's see if today's one arrive.

I suspect it may be related to the fact that there was a broken build
of hawkey sent to Rawhide on July 17th. I just pushed a fix this
morning. (It was no longer building the python3 bindings)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150720/0373357b/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list