Geeqie... I'll take it -- but I'd like co-maintainers! [was Re: Orphaned Geeqie]

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 21/07/15 09:10 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> For example this can't be right:
>>        if (rgb1[0] == rgb1[1] == rgb1[2]) {
>
>Ouch. *Digs back in memory* -- so if rgb1[0] and rgb1[1] are equal and
>rgb1[2] is 1, or if rgb1[0] and rgb1[1] are *not* equal and rgb[2] is
>0, this will be true, and in all other cases false. Perfectly valid
>code!

Full marks! :-)

If that's really what the author intended then it's far too
clever/subtle to go without a comment, but I suspect it's just a bug.