Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23

Jonathan Wakely jwakely at redhat.com
Wed Jul 22 12:30:30 UTC 2015


On 22/07/15 14:08 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
>> will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebuilt. The plan
>> was to update to 1.59.0 but that isn't going to be released in time
>> for the F23 schedule, so I'll update rawhide to 1.59.0 at a later
>> date.
>>
>> For the F23 rebuilds please use the tag f23-boost e.g.
>>
>>  fedpkg build --target f23-boost
>>
>> For the rawhide rebuilds please use the tag f24-boost e.g.
>>
>>  fedpkg build --target f24-boost
>
>Does this mean that maintainers are expected to rebuild their packages
>themselves?

What's the usual policy? Should I be doing it? (Can I do it, if I
don't have privs to commit a new %release to the spec file and push
that?)

If I'm supposed to be doing it then I'll get started immediately :-)




More information about the devel mailing list