[ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Mon Jul 27 14:28:55 UTC 2015


On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
> >> If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is
> >> the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is
> >> there a replacement tool?
> >
> > What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives
> >  me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged
> > installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in....
> 
> From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few,
> but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use
> execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been
> bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time
> not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery.

we can query buildrequires: 

repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink
aide-0:0.15.1-10.fc23.src
anyterm-0:1.1.29-27.fc23.src
elpa-0:2015.02.002-5.fc23.src
gnu-smalltalk-0:3.2.5-9.fc23.src
gromacs-0:5.0.5-3.fc23.src
hugs98-0:2006.09-22.fc23.src
lightning-0:2.1.0-3.fc23.src
openblas-0:0.2.14-3.fc23.src
skychart-0:3.10-6.fc23.src
transgui-0:5.0.1-4.fc23.src
wine-0:1.7.47-1.fc23.src
zfs-fuse-0:0.7.0-21.fc23.src




-- 
Sérgio M. B.



More information about the devel mailing list