F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides
manisandro at gmail.com
Mon Jul 27 22:05:52 UTC 2015
On 27.07.2015 23:56, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Ok I've now got one full build of all MPI packages . Investigating
> the output, things are looking good, except for the fact that I
> realized that I'll also need to handle binaries MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH
> and MPI_FORTRAN_MOD_DIR - these directories are outside MPI_HOME and
> hence currently don't get the enhanced requires/provides strings.
> Since change deadline is tomorrow, I'd like to see the rebuilds
> starting to land in rawhide+F23 despite of this remaining issue, and
> then I'll look at cleanly adapting the scripts to also handle the
> (few) remaining cases.
> I've prepared a set of git am-able patches to apply to the various
> packages here . The rebuild sequence needed is posted below.
> Know FTBFS are paraview (protobuf incompatibility) and netgen-mesher
(orrection: that would be gmsh
> (someone had the great idea of doing something like #define Status int
> in a public header and I haven't yet got around to finding out who).
> Affected by the missing handling of MPI_PYTHON_SITEARCH and
> MPI_FORTRAN_MOD_DIR are elpa, sundials, pypar and mpi4py.
> So if any proven packager could fire the rebuilds, that would be much
>  https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/smani/rpm-mpi-hooks-testing2
>  https://smani.fedorapeople.org/rpm-mpi-hooks/patches/
> Rebuild sequence (these are four groups, items within a group can be
> built together):
More information about the devel