FESCo Meeting Minutes (2015-03-04)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:41:45AM +0000, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2015-03-04, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:
> > * #615 Strategy for services that do not have systemd native unit files
> >   (ajax, 18:03:09)
> >   * AGREED: drop sysvinit subpackages if a systemd unit file exists, in
> >     f23  (ajax, 18:17:32)
> >   * AGREED: drop sysvinit subpackages if a systemd unit file exists, in
> >     f23  (ajax, 18:18:00)
> >   * ACTION: ajax to prune sysvinit subpackages in f23  (ajax, 18:22:03)
> >
> What? The topic was "services that do not have systemd native unit files"
> but the decision was on "subpackages if a systemd unit file exists"?
> 
> In other words, the decision was about completly different set of packages?
Yes, but this decision makes sense imho. The way I understand FESCo
members' reasoning is:

1. dropping sysinit support in packages *with* systemd unit files is
   the first step.
2. it is too late to do anything for F22 anyway, and after 1. is done,
   the issue can be revisited for packages *without* direct systemd support.

Zbyszek