ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
> > Rich Mattes <richmattes at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
> >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0.  These issues are cropping up in f23.
> >>
> >> There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather
> >> than later as rawhide is currently a big game of whack-a-mole when
> >> building c++ packages.
> > As soon as gcc folks say things are settled down enough to do one, we
> > can look at scheduling one. ;) 
> >
> > It would be a shame to do it too soon though and have a bug requiring
> > another one. 
> >
> > I've been rebuilding things as I run into them being broken. 
> > (The other day it was the gobby stack: net6, libxml++, obby, gobby). 
> Is it ok to rebuild all dependencies f.e. for fix build issue with
> pfstools introduced by that update? Or just fill bugzilla issues for owners?

If a simple rebuild works, I'd say go ahead and do it. If it's more
complicated, file a bug and attach any necessary patches (and ask the POC
if you can act on it yourself). That's what I usually do.

Regards,
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"