ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: ->

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at
Tue Mar 10 13:49:28 UTC 2015

On 03/10/2015 01:30 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:
>>> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
>>> Rich Mattes <richmattes at> wrote:
>>>> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
>>>> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0.  These issues are cropping up in f23.
>>>> There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather
>>>> than later as rawhide is currently a big game of whack-a-mole when
>>>> building c++ packages.
>>> As soon as gcc folks say things are settled down enough to do one, we
>>> can look at scheduling one. ;)
>>> It would be a shame to do it too soon though and have a bug requiring
>>> another one.
>>> I've been rebuilding things as I run into them being broken.
>>> (The other day it was the gobby stack: net6, libxml++, obby, gobby).
>> Is it ok to rebuild all dependencies f.e. for fix build issue with
>> pfstools introduced by that update? Or just fill bugzilla issues for owners?
> If a simple rebuild works, I'd say go ahead and do it.
It only partially does.

> If it's more
> complicated,
Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages 
simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite 

So far I've hit:
- GCC-5.0
- "Hardening"
- boost upgrade
- ImageMagick
- autotool upgrade.

Openly said, the situation on f23 is a mess.


More information about the devel mailing list