FreeRDP downgrade in rawhide and f22 updates-testing

Kevin Fenzi kevin at
Wed Mar 18 13:40:15 UTC 2015

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:13:06 +0000
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse
> <dwmw2 at> wrote:
> > After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we
> > concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've
> > reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta.
> >
> > The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawhide and f22
> > updates-testing. Am I right in thinking that we *don't* need to
> > bump the epoch in order to go back to 1.2.0, and that testers
> > should expect to have to use 'distro-sync' occasionally instead of
> > just 'update'?
> >
> > I suppose we can bump the epoch if we have to (it's already
> > non-zero, after all), but my first inclination is always to try to
> > avoid doing so.
> If you've pushed them out to people you'll need to bump the epoch,
> expecting people to run distro-sync isn't a fix and there's other
> processes that don't have that functionality (secondary arch builds
> amongst other things) to deal with it.

Yep. Epoch bump time. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the devel mailing list