F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support

Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 16:46:18 UTC 2015


On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Mike Pinkerton  wrote:

> What I don't understand is the wisdom of an official Fedora "product"
> endorsing a copr when either the software or packaging (or both) is not of
> sufficient quality to make it into the official Fedora repo.

I don't think of it as a endorsement.  It is making them more easily
discoverable but there is going to be a prompt of some sort that warns them
of the nature of such software and users get to choose whether they are
willing to accept that tradeoff for immediate access.  One might choose to
use say, Chromium regardless of the bundling issues for example.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150318/6f73ba8f/attachment.html>

More information about the devel mailing list