F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
jreznik at redhat.com
Thu Mar 19 09:59:31 UTC 2015
----- Original Message -----
> On 03/18/2015 12:55 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > How are "disabled repositories" going to be approved for inclusion?
> While you likely meant political meaning of "how", I would like share how it
> will be done technically.
> Approximately 6 months ago Env&Stack wanted to have "Playground repository",
> which would be set of Copr repositories.
> Something guaranteed to meet legal requirements, something with sufficient
> quality. Copr already have this attribute for
> every project and admins of Copr can set/unset this flag.
> You can already enable those repositories by:
> dnf playground enable
> if you have dnf-plugins-core. Unfortunately this set is currently empty :)
> Half a year ago the blocker for Env&Stack was that Copr can not sign
> packages. Copr can do that for few weeks now and I
> notified Env&Stack so they can continue on they work on Playground
> This is IMO ideal candidate for disabled repositories with enabled metadata.
Yep, I raised it on the Council meeting and these two proposals work
pretty well together!
> I am not sure how to deliver those disable repositories though. But that is
> likely for different discussion.
> Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
> Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel