/boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby
drago01 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 17:58:34 UTC 2015
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Josef Bacik <josef at toxicpanda.com> wrote:
>> Cool so then we use grubby for these other cases and use the grub2
>> stuff for the grub2 case which covers the majority of installs and
>> lets us use btrfs for /boot. Then as new features are added to grub2
>> for btrfs we don't have to worry about some other package being
>> updated, we just automatically get them when we update the package.
>> I'll take a look at what needs to be done when I get back from
>> vacation. Thanks,
> Using grub2-mkconfig instead of grubby on x86 was suggested and
> rejected primarily on the basis that grub-mkconfig discards the
> existing grub.cfg, which can contain user add/modified entries, and
> generates a completely new one. Ergo, grubby and GRUB upstreams
> fundamentally disagree on the fairly basic principle of whether the
> grub.cfg should be modifiable outside of GRUB tools or regenerated
> from scratch each time a kernel version or boot parameter change
That is not the only issue.
If grub itself gets updated and you run grub2-mkconfig the generated
config file might cause issues with the grub that is actually
installed on disk (we do not reinstall grub on updates).
More information about the devel