"Your Outstanding Requests" on closed bugs
nhorman at redhat.com
Tue Mar 31 11:54:02 UTC 2015
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:34:47AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 30.3.2015 v 22:17 Neil Horman napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >>>> On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >>>>> There are currently no flags set at all.
> >>>> Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
> >>> Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at least I know how
> >>> to get rid of it, although I think it should clear out all requests
> >>> for closed bugs.
> >> This in practice isn't a safe assumption. People do legitimately
> >> discuss closed bugs, including requesting and providing information.
> >> "Closed" does not always imply "no further discussion is needed or
> >> desired".
> > I would assert the opposite to be true. That is to say a state of "closed" by
> > definition implies that a bug no longer needs discussion or consideration. In
> > the converse, a bug that is still receiving updates in the form of comments,
> > likely should not be in the state "closed".
> Is "Thank you" comment allowed after the bug is closed?
Sure I don't see why not. This in my mind is more about the flags.
> > Neil
> >> --
> >> Adam Williamson
> >> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> >> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> >> http://www.happyassassin.net
> >> --
> >> devel mailing list
> >> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel