Naming packages when upstream uses dashes in the release version

Petr Stodulka pstodulk at redhat.com
Wed May 6 09:05:48 UTC 2015



On 6.5.2015 11:02, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 06/05/15 10:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> So basically, one could end up using foo-3.80-1.1.20150506.rpm,
>
> No. The release part (here 1.1.2015050) should not contain any part of 
> the upstream release number. The same goes for foo-3.80-1_1.rpm.
>
> I think the reasonable options are foo-3.80_1-1.rpm or foo-3.80.1-1.rpm
>
>
I agree with Alec. May foo-3.80_1-1.rpm is better option in this case.
>
> Cheers!
>
> --alec



More information about the devel mailing list