Updates (was Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !)

[Reindl Harald]

Am 02.11.2015 um 00:36 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
>> *who* if not the package maintainer which hopefully uses his own
>> packages should have the final say? some group of people not
>> understanding the issues really?
>
> The counterargument is that we keep seeing major version updates that
> violate our existing updates policy. Who if not a neutral party charged
> with upholding that policy should have the final say? Some maintainers
> who clearly haven't read it?

and what about software not breaking randomly?

a version number don't say *anything* about the impact of a update - 
there are stol developers out there which are able to provide new 
feautures without breaking everything left and right

show me as example *one* postfix major update in the last 10 years 
breaking existing setups - not every upstream acts like GNOME

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151102/2201b527/attachment.sig>