STOP messing with nfs-utls... PLEASE!!!

Steve Dickson SteveD at redhat.com
Wed Nov 4 11:57:41 UTC 2015



On 11/04/2015 06:37 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
>>>> I feel this is a better way to handle these issues
>>>>> than the bootstrapping option (which will be
>>>>> reverted from nfs-utils).
>>> I think I've addressed these.
>>>
>>> But we probably should do one last version bump in fedfs-utils and
>>> autofs to ensure everything still builds properly when it's
>>> reverted,
>>> correct?
>>>
>> I already verified both fedfs-utils and autofs build without nfs
>> -utils,
>> but nfs-utils is still required to install fedfs-client and fedfs
>> -server.
> 
> Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw.
> 
> It makes sense for fedfs-utils-client and fedfs-utils-server to require
> nfs-utils doesn't it?
Yes... I think so... 

steved.



More information about the devel mailing list