Cloning bugs: Just Don't Do It
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Wed Nov 4 14:31:35 UTC 2015
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:25:32 +0000
Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mostly agreed. The one legit use-case though is when someone wants to
> to continue a package submission after a review has gone dead due to
> the original submitter vanishing. There's often useful information you
> want to carry through to the final review, but it's not possible to
> take ownership of the bug (afaik).
Nope. In that case they should open a new review bug and close the old
one as a duplicate.
Then anyone who wants to look at the old review can go look at it.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews?rd=Extras/Policy/StalledReviews
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151104/ab8fbd05/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list