Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)
Reindl Harald
h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sat Nov 7 18:31:06 UTC 2015
Am 07.11.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net
> maybe you did not get "not that i say Fedora should go ahead and
> build with -mavx" but we talk about SSE3
>
> talking about a rapid moving distribution like Fedora and at the
> same time hestitate to use technology available for a decade is
> strange - i guess people plan to run their hardware for 10, 12, 15
> years are not using typically a distribution like Fedora
>
> The flip side of it is that Fedora is the foundation for RHEL and other
> distributions. Most of the others don't matter so much, but RHEL does,
> as that has to support servers and such. But even there, I would suggest
> to say that we could say that RHEL 8 shouldn't have a problem bumping
> up, since RHEL 7 supports those systems fine and will be supported for 9
> more years.
that must be why Redhat dropped i686 completly with RHEL7...
BTW: you converting of plaintext mails to HTML and place a few lines
below a full quote is annoying
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
that's also annoying especially if you place a 1-liner HTML repsonse at
the bottom of a unstripped post, and it's annoying like all sort of
fortune-messages for train bayes-filters with ham
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151107/9f4fbe62/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list