Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

[Kevin Kofler]

Reindl Harald wrote:
> if there would be no difference kernel upstream won't invest that much
> time for runtime-cpu-detection (look at the bootlog on different hardware)

Exactly BECAUSE performance-critical software normally does runtime 
detection (except where upstream is really really lazy), hardcoding a 
requirement for newer instruction sets does not buy us anything.

The absence of a portable fallback also makes the software unusable on our 
secondary architectures, and in some cases (such as Darktable), even on the 
PRIMARY architecture ARM. (Now, whether ARM should be a primary architecture 
to begin with is a different matter, but it currently is.)

So I really don't understand those upstreams that provide ONLY platform-
specific vector code with no portable version.

        Kevin Kofler