Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sun Nov 8 09:35:20 UTC 2015



Am 08.11.2015 um 09:47 schrieb drago01:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> Am 07.11.2015 um 20:36 schrieb drago01:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> the point is compile a single application with new features won't gain
>>>> that
>>>> muc 8until you do the same with most libraries used by the software) but
>>>> having the whole distribution is a summary with a completly different
>>>> behavior than a single test of software xyz
>>>
>>>
>>> Uh no you just have to compile the software any libraries used by the
>>> hot paths of the software you are trying to test.
>>
>>
>> for which one?
>> that don't show the impact on a complete distribution anyways
>
> There is no such thing as "the complete distribution" ... the flags
> used to compile libreoffice won't affect http or firefox

surely, there is such a thing

on a typical machine is running way more than a single application, you 
have (growing) background-noise, currently plasma-desktop eats 25-30% of 
a core, X eats some percent and so on

htop shows 7-10%  i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz by doing *nothing* expect write 
that mail and listen to a MP3 file in the background

the distribution flags are going to be interesting when each of this 
pieces is more efficient while you are doing CPU intense tasks also 
working more efficient

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151108/c55bd2f6/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list