where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

Andrew Lutomirski luto at mit.edu
Thu Nov 12 16:07:26 UTC 2015


On Nov 12, 2015 7:21 AM, "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto at mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > I think that Bodhi should arrange, at least by default, to push things
in
> > the correct order.  Whether that means that karma is required
separately for
> > each branch is an orthogonal issue, except insofar as allowing karma
from
> > one branch to carry over to another would also require Bodhi to track
that
> > two updates are the same thing but just to different branches.
>
> Two updates in separate branches are never the same thing.  They may
> be the same version of the specific package, but there is no guarantee
> that:
>
> a) they were built with the same toolchain
> b) they were built with the same configuration options
> c) they were built for the same reasons
>
> While it would be convenient for developers to tell bodhi they are the
> same, it's a lie we all tell ourselves.  I don't think we should code
> our update tool to lie.
>
> > At the very least, Bodhi should *not* push to F22 due to autokarma
until F23
> > stable is requested.
>
> I certainly agree with this in principle, but it would force
> everything (including rawhide composes) to be serial and the slowdown
> would be significant.
>

I'm a bit confused.  Wouldn't rawhide be unaffected because rawhide can
always have newer versions without breaking the upgrade path?  It's only
the old branch (currently F22) that would be slower, no?

--Andy

--Andy

> josh
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151112/70e7b104/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list