ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

Adam Williamson adamwill at fedoraproject.org
Thu Nov 19 00:00:41 UTC 2015


On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 17:19 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Williamson (adamwill at fedoraproject.org) said: 
> > > You really really want libselinux-python(2) for that as well - it's needed
> > > for any file/copy/templating you'd do on the node to ensure proper SELinux
> > > contexts. (In fact, Ansible will abort on the node without it if it detects
> > > SELinux in use, as it doesn't want to misconfigure the node.)
> > 
> > Well, I explicitly addressed that above: I think as soon as you get
> > into adding packages that are needed for some particular module, you're
> > on a slippery slope which winds up with including docker...how do we
> > decide which modules are 'essential' and which aren't?
> 
> I think that the slipperly slope argument is taking the easy way out here. Ensuring
> that modules like 'file', 'template', and 'copy' work is not the same as including
> docker in the minimal image.

OK - so what's the clear and non-controversial definition of "modules
like 'file', 'template' and 'copy'"? What do those modules share in
common that we can define clearly and concisely and in a way there
won't be any serious dispute over?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net




More information about the devel mailing list