Packaging:NamingGuidelines Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

[Tomas Mraz]

On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 20:59 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> writes:
> > 
> > SB> When we fix the .spec and don't change the source, we bump
> > rightmost
> > SB> version, when we change the source, we bump the left version, so
> > we
> > SB> can distinguish when we update the source and when we updated the
> > SB> .spec, this contrast for me is important.
> > 
> > For me, the simple rule that a Release: tag less than 1 implies
> > prerelease software, while a Release: tag of 1 or greater implies a
> > post-release package, is important.  So far the proponents of this
> > change haven't shown what things would actually look like after this
> > change, so it's hard for me to come up with a reason to change my
> > opinion.
> 
> prerelease numbering can't begin with 0 and increased to 0.1 because :
> 
> next version of foo-0.b would be foo-0.1.b and "b">1 

Nope, 1>"b" in rpm version compare.

-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb
(You'll never know whether the road is wrong though.)