Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Matthew Miller mattdm at
Thu Oct 1 23:00:13 UTC 2015

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:38:31PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >bundling out. Second, it demonstrates a case where it'd be better if
> >the bundling had been documented, because it would have shown up in a
> >query when the security team was working on that vulnerability
> the last part *only* works *if* it had been documented
> nothing of the whole thread solves the problem of unintentionally
> bundeling becaue missing knowledge or just not care about it
> in a perfect world upsteram would not write crap which needs to be
> unbundeled as well as maintainers would not bundle withoput
> intemtion by missing knowledge - nothing of that is solved or
> targeted

That's a good point; it's not in the scope of this proposal. However,
it does fit with what Matthias said earier in this thread — automation
is key. We definitely have some pieces of that puzzle already — I'd
love to hear about a project to put them together.

Matthew Miller
<mattdm at>
Fedora Project Leader

More information about the devel mailing list