install custom rpm package: failed dependencies

arnaud gaboury arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 18:03:45 UTC 2015


On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/08/2015 07:10 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I wrote a .spec file to build a pacakge with many shared
>> librairies installed by Intel parallel studio 2016.
>>
>> There is no Fedora package for Intel, but the installation script
>> install many .rpm packages, and all are correctly listed when
>> running $ dnf list
>>
>> Building my package goes fine. I am no left with one issue when I
>> want to install it.
>>
>> # dnf install R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 Error: nothing
>> provides libimf.so()(64bit) needed by
>> libRmath-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64. nothing provides
>> libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) needed by
>> R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64. nothing provides
>> libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) needed by
>> R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64. nothing provides
>> libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) needed by
>> R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64. nothing provides
>> libimf.so()(64bit) needed by libRmath-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64.
>> nothing provides libimf.so()(64bit) needed by
>> libRmath-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64. nothing provides
>> libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) needed by
>> R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64. nothing provides
>> libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) needed by
>> R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64. nothing provides
>> libimf.so()(64bit) needed by libRmath-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64
>>
>> % rpm -i --test R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 error: Failed
>> dependencies: libifcoremt.so.5()(64bit) is needed by
>> R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libifport.so.5()(64bit) is needed
>> by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libimf.so()(64bit) is needed by
>> R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libintlc.so.5()(64bit) is needed
>> by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libiomp5.so()(64bit) is needed
>> by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libiomp5.so(VERSION)(64bit) is
>> needed by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libirc.so()(64bit) is
>> needed by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libirng.so()(64bit) is
>> needed by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libmkl_rt.so()(64bit) is
>> needed by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64 libsvml.so()(64bit) is
>> needed by R-core-3.2.2-intel.fc22.1.x86_64
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  All these shared objects are installed on my system and are part
>> of the Intel mega package.
>
> Are you sure?

$ ls /opt/intel/lib/intel64/
......
libifcoremt.so.5
libimf.so
......

$ env
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/intel/lib/intel64/


>
> What is the output of
>
>  repoquery --whatprovides libifcoremt.so.5

% dnf repoquery --whatprovides libifcoremt.so.5
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:02:04 ago on Thu Oct  8
19:54:40 2015.


I am not surprised as I installed Intel parallel studio from their own
install package which provieds the needed rpm.
>
> ?
>
>>
>> I thought writing this in my spec file was enough. Example:
>> BuildRequire: inetl-ifort-l-ps-109
>
> **BuildRequires:**

Yes, I made a typo

>
>>
>> this package has been installed by Intel parallel studio and
>> provides libifport.so.5.:
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
> % dnf info intel-ifort-l-ps-109-16.0.0-109.x86_64
>>
>> Last metadata expiration check performed 12 days, 6:08:27 ago on
>> Sat Sep 26 12:51:00 2015. Installed Packages Name        :
>> intel-ifort-l-ps-109 Arch        : x86_64 Epoch       : 0 Version
>> : 16.0.0 Release     : 109 Size        : 26 M Repo        :
>> @System Summary     : Intel(R) Fortran Compiler 16.0 for Linux*
>> License     : Intel Copyright 1999-2015 Description : Intel(R)
>> Fortran Compiler 16.0 for Linux*
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  How can I solve this issue properly? Is there anything I can do
>> at build time or add in the spec file? I can fo course # rpm -i
>> --nodeps MyPackage, but I would prefer to avoid and write an
>> academic spec file.
>>
>
> Can read all your custom SPECs would be useful.
>
> - --
> Antonio Trande
>
> mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
> http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
> GPG Key: 0x565E653C
> Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWFqgqAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU80PAH/RKFlznY6TebSz96rtNvZX9x
> eQO75x72S1VKzB0THvHaVeBvzpUN+7BSbR4vOX7FPq+dayWJCyAdk+DxKnKCHsA1
> XqjhJktGNdEUwhFhqfMPt4LkUw4alXhXVgzkb3UQx2DpmyYRliaW3mQH0Tjs8CTm
> GZDzuaPPRyTXDQyY3YX722ly3vBYqKSnUdS/uhmcMDLqiFJMGNoRhcHnYQYi+RKj
> 1DkNdx1iLohBY8vCAhwVJVFS9a3t8giu4Ymmfq5InIMNluSx6EF7KG1d2UqqDkP9
> 65SvJuNK7do8G3ghFAi5shq3u0BAHzQTtNoP9Gq1ZLDbgBqCynsyBGjMS8Kvh9Y=
> =coyi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct



-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx


More information about the devel mailing list