To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2015-10-16 at 09:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:49:22 +0100
> Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1]
> > 
> > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached the
> > stable karma threshold:
> > 
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11787
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4638
> 
> Well, the maintainers of those updates could choose to do so.
> 
> Can you mail them about it? Hopefully the bodhi2 db would get fixed up
> for these old updates, but maintainers should be able to push them,
> it's just autokarma thats possibly messed up. 

yes , it is just autokarma thats messed up and push packages is one way
to fix the problem ..., which is easier . 

> Or if you prefer I can mail them... 

Yeah I prefer .


> > This doesn't reached the stable karma threshold but should also be
> > pushed, because packages shouldn't stay in update testing forever ... 
> 
> Likewise these can be pushed by their submittors...
> 
> THis first one: 
> 
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7604
> 
> Is one of mine. I didn't push it because I am concerned about the
> sa-timer issue mentioned in one of the comments. I couldn't duplicate
> the issue, but wanted to see  some more user comments before pushing to
> stable.
> 
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12402
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0189
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11499
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7171
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/372
> 
> I'd suggest all maintainers should periodically check: 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?user=<yourusername>&status=testing
> For their updates that are in testing. 

This kind of minor problems can happen because some people not care
about their updates, my `dnf list extras` , sometimes have packages from
updates-testing , that enter before GA (IIRC) and which never go to
stable , so upgraded system (from beta) will have different packages of
stable ISO , which is not good for testing, conclusion, IMHO, we should
clean updates-testing from time to time, to sync testing users with
stable users . 
Although after the GA can make sense to have packages in testing without going to the stable.
Anyway not a big deal , is just my `dnf list extras`

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.