Ownership of /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Sat Oct 17 17:35:08 UTC 2015


On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:06:01 -0600
Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> wrote:

> Various packages now install files into /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs for
> use when building rpms.  Currently that directory is owned by:
> 
> rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64
> javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch
> 
> Of the various packages on my machine that install files there:
> 
> gstreamer1-1.6.0-2.fc23.x86_64
> javapackages-tools-4.6.0-6.fc23.noarch
> kde-settings-23-7.fc23.noarch
> nodejs-0.10.36-4.fc23.x86_64
> perl-generators-1.06-1.fc23.noarch
> python3-cups-1.9.72-2.fc23.x86_64
> redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.noarch
> rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.4.fc23.x86_64
> rpm-mpi-hooks-3-2.fc23.noarch
> 
> only rpm-mpi-hooks requires rpm-build for directory ownership, while
> javapackages-tools takes the route of owning the directory.  However,
> I'd rather rpm-mpi-hooks not require rpm-build as it's not really
> necessary other than for this directory.  The simple thing I think
> would be for rpm to own the directory.  Does that seem reasonable?

Sounds reasonable to me. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151017/5dd471ad/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list