make unmaintained ??

[drago01]

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" <jan.kratochvil at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
>> > an update for F23 also.
>>
>> I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the
>> F-23
>> freezing stages?  It may cause FTBFSes or even broken builds.  What is
>> then
>> all the release engineering good for?  Why not to just run Rawhide then?
>>
>
> I have to agree. I have been bitten too many times by minor tweaks breaking
> builds in the OS. However the rules where a completely frozen build system
> was causing problems in the past so I am expecting make is considered less
> important than gcc?

We have been shipping gcc bugfix updates all the time ... there is no
reason why we shouldn't do the same for make.