To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 29.10.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 17:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync.
>>
>> [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677
>
> yep, so not distro-sync

nonsense when i read the bugreport

* system-upgrade now uses dnf (standard "dnf update" approach)

THAT is the problem and i really wonder what somebody thinks by 
implement it that way after *many years* of "yum --releasever=XX 
distro-sync" works absolutely relieable

* change "dnf update" mode during system upgrade to
   "dnf distro-sync --allowerasing"

THAT is the right direction but nonsense because --allowerasing is a 
terrible idea, anyways "dnf --releasever=XX distro-sync" is not affected 
by both wrong solutions as far as i see (expect DNF is intentionally or 
unintenioally broken elsewhere there)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151029/12b3c3dd/attachment.sig>