Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

Paul Wouters paul at nohats.ca
Wed Sep 2 14:10:19 UTC 2015


On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:

> 3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open

> I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the
> packages from 2nd category should be orphaned and the packages from 3rd
> category should not be monitored anymore. Any thoughts?

I would keep monitoring for 3) but close onesting bugs that are too old
and were clearly forgotten. I prefer to be informed by the monitor
script, even if I am a version behind :)

I've also just now added comments for all my entries on why these are
still not in CLOSED state.

Paul

>
> Vít
>
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&classification=Fedora&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Copendate&email1=upstream-release-monitoring%40fedoraproject.org&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=1733771&order=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_id%20DESC&query_based_on=&query_format=advanced
>
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
>
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


More information about the devel mailing list