[Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Jon Ciesla limburgher at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 15:51:01 UTC 2015


On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Adam Williamson <
adamwill at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.c
> > om>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I assume that subject line got your attention.
> > >
> > > Most definitely. :)
> >
> > So it's basically the same but without FPC as a gatekeeper?  Do you
> > have
> > any proposals for enforcement?  A periodic query of Provides
> > (bundled-foo)
> > and a BZ requesting a review?  Sometime projects enable unbundling
> > over
> > time.
>
> Do we have any kind of consistent 'enforcement' of the *current*
>

Not really.  People find things and file BZs to get them fixed, but there's
really no pressure.


> policy?
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150910/7b9ebd47/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list