[Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Thu Sep 10 17:48:22 UTC 2015



Am 10.09.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
> Right, so that's basically the point of this thread. It's time to
> decide if we as the Fedora Community still care enough to go through
> all that process. I didn't want to just have one group (FESCo)
> deciding something of that import without bringing it to the community
> for discussion first.
>
> Also, please understand that this isn't an indictment of the work you
> did. Under the mission you were given, you came up with a set of
> policies that generally worked. It's just time to figure out if we
> still need them.

yes

if i would want a operating system where i have no idea after security 
updates for a library if *all* applications are fixed i could just have 
gone to Apple OSX or stayed at Windows

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150910/11061443/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list