[Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 19:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "AM" == Adam Miller <maxamillion at fedoraproject.org> writes:
> 
> AM> I also like the proposal for the bundled(<libname>) macro
> definition
> AM> for tracking purposes.
> 
> Just a note that it isn't a proposal; that is the current requirement
> for anything which bundles things.
> 


Right, this is the current requirement for anything with a bundling
exception granted by FPC. If we adopted this high-level policy to skip
the exception process, that would (by the transitive property) make
this a requirement of all packages carrying known bundles.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150911/90011add/attachment.sig>