[Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

> As for which components, it's not about specific examples[1]. It's
> about solving the question in a generic way. We have quite a lot of
> software that isn't packaged for Fedora (either not started or
> aborted
> when the package review couldn't be passed) that has genuine value.

I can certainly confirm that. I dug through quite a lot of review
requests yesterday to look at how the rules have been applied in
practice, and found several that have been abandoned because of
bundling issues. I'll just link one example -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836810 - but it's trivial
to find more.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net