[fedora-virt] Do we need the Fedora 'virt' mailing list?

Cole Robinson crobinso at redhat.com
Wed Sep 16 14:08:57 UTC 2015


On 09/16/2015 08:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
>>
>> The virt list has long been in an odd place.  Fedora has best in class
>> virt support, because so many virt developers use it.  It also follows
>> upstream very closely, with upstream packages like libvirt and qemu
>> going straight into Rawhide without any significant patching.
>>
>> So there isn't really much need for a Fedora+virt-specific list, since
>> almost any question should go upstream to one of the following lists:
>>
>>  - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
>>  - https://libvirt.org/contact.html#email
>>  - http://wiki.qemu.org/MailingLists
>>  - https://libosinfo.org/communicate/
>>  - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
>>
>> Or as a last resort if it really is a rare virt integration issue that
>> only affects to Fedora, then:
>>
>>  - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>  - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>> Can we kill the virt list?
> 
> At this point in time, I'd say yes.
> 

Yeah I've thought similar for a long while too. So I'm for it. I'll leave a
bit more time for discussion but if nothing changes I'll close the list next week.

- Cole


More information about the devel mailing list